Archive for January 2015

Once again, Charleston should learn from Venice….

STARS ALIGNED AGAINST BIG SHIPSLike Charleston, Venice has mixed feelings about the cruise industry. Environmentalists and preservationists — and movie stars — fear large ships will do extensive damage to the fragile city. So in November the city took a stand by banning large cruise ships (more than 96,000 gross tons) from sailing through the historic city within 1,000 feet of historic St. Mark’s Square.

But people in the tourism industry, who estimated the ban would reduce the number of tourists in Venice by 30,000, fought back. And this month, a regional court of appeals overturned the ban.

In doing so, it likely displeased the glitterati who petitioned to restrict cruise ships that have “mortally threatened” the city known as the Queen of the Adriatic. Michael Douglas, Cate Blanchett, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Rob Lowe, Michael Caine, Diane Lane, Edward Norton, Susan Sarandon, Isabella Rossellini and Julie Christie are among the endorsees.

 UNESCO officials also expressed distress over the court’s action. Venice is a UNESCO World Heritage site.

The ban applied, albeit briefly, to ships that carry roughly 2,260 passengers or more. (The Fantasy, which is home-ported in Charleston, accommodates 2,052 passengers.)

But Venice will have a respite of sorts anyway from the ships some refer to as “skyscrapers of the sea.” The Cruise Lines International Association, which represents 53 major cruise lines, said 2015 itineraries have already been finalized — without stops in Venice.

Further, CLIA has decided not to make longer-range itinerary plans until a decision is made about constructing an alternate route to the passenger terminal — a route that would not threaten the historic city.

Last year, Venice capped the number of cruise ships visiting at 708. (The S.C. State Ports Authority has pledged to limit the number of cruise ships in Charleston to 104 a year.)

Venice hasn’t figured it all out yet, but it’s worth noting that officials there have acknowledged cruise ships’ potential damage and are trying to implement enforceable restrictions.

Hmm. Seems like a good idea for any port to work out with its host city.

The times are NOT a changing…

Cruise Ships Are Unregulated Trouble on the High Seas

Elizabeth Becker

Elizabeth Becker, a former New York Times correspondent, is the author of “Overbooked: The Exploding Business of Travel and Tourism.”

Congress has exempted these behemoths from labor laws and environmental regulations. Passengers need to look for responsible ones.

December 29, 2014

Cruise ships have become the symbol of all that’s gone haywire in the tourism industry.

The largest of these floating hotels are the size of horizontal skyscrapers and carry as many as 6,000 passengers. They cross the seas polluting the water and air and overwhelming their ports of call. Their accidents make headlines: from the deadly capsizing of a ship off the coast of Italy to a child drowning because no lifeguard was on duty.

Every day the average cruise ship dumps 21,000 gallons of human waste, one ton of solid waste garbage, 170,000 gallons of wastewater and 8,500 plastic bottles in the ocean. That’s according to the Environmental Protection Agency – cruise ships are under no regulatory obligation to monitor or report what they release.

This lack of modern regulations is the core problem and the chief reason why cruises are so popular. Less regulation translates into cheaper tickets($389 for seven days in the Bahamas!) Cruises make their big profits once passengers are onboard from alcohol sales, gambling and those on-shore excursions. Plus cruises are easy – one bed, no decisions.

Congress has allowed these behemoths to operate like a Vegas resort without any of the regulations that apply in the United States. Thanks to Congress, cruises are exempt from: labor laws (waiters are paid $50 a month plus tips and no benefits); most sewage and water regulations under the Clean Water Act; and standards of the Clean Air Act in international waters.

Carnival and Royal Caribbean are headquartered in Miami and, with their subsidiaries, represent nearly two-thirds of the global cruise business. Yet they largely operate outside of most American regulatory laws – and pay almost no corporate taxes. They do this by flagging and registering their ships in other nations (Liberia, Panama and the Bahamas) and winning the right from Congress to be treated in most instances like a commercial vessel and not a hotel.

Since Congress hasn’t budged on these issues – cruise lines are generous donors – local and regional authorities have stepped into the breach.

Citizens of cities as different as Venice, Italy, and Charleston, S.C., are trying to block the biggest ships from docking. Vancouver banned cruise ship air pollution during the Olympic Winter Games. Belize has restricted cruise passengers to one beach area – a practice known in the industry as a sacrifice zone – to protect other ares from being trashed.

The E.P.A. has endorsed new California laws forbidding cruise ships from discharging any waste along its coast. Antarctica banned all large cruise ships because its fragile environment can’t afford a single accident.

Consumers can do their part by finding a cruise that respects the environment from online resources like “The Cruise Report Card” by Friends of the Earth, and “Eco-Friendly Cruises” by Nerd Wallet.